stinglikeabee: classic denny colt  (giornalista)
An excerpt on The Guardian from the upcoming book Eat Your Heart Out: Why the Food Business Is Bad for the Planet and Your Health by Felicity Lawrence explains why the previously unknown soya bean is now king of agricultural commodities:

The US came out of the second world war with its agricultural base intact, but the farming lands of its European allies and of Germany had been devastated. With millions desperately hungry, the US announced its Marshall plan to help rebuild western Europe with financial aid. But it had another crucial role: the removal of tariff barriers that might hinder US access to foreign markets was made part of the new terms of trade with the non-communist world. Of the $13bn in financial aid paid under the Marshall plan between 1947 and 1952, more than $3bn was spent by European countries on imports of US food, animal feed and fertiliser.

As Europe recovered, soya exports to other countries were supported by other US food aid programmes. In 1967, 86% of all US soya oil exports were subsidised under its food aid law. Meanwhile, in the Kennedy round of talks for the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade in the mid-60s, the US insisted that if Europe wanted to keep its agricultural protections, it must open up its markets to more US soya exports.The excerpt describes just how efficient the soya bean is: its oil used to fry or make fast foods, its lecithin for processing, its bean meal as feed. Combined with the high amount of US subsidies for this crop, the profit margin becomes irresistible. It is one of the reasons why plenty of the Brazilian rainforest is being cut down for soya fields.

Amazingly, it is stated there are only a few companies that populate the soya and other cheap grain commodities field. Cargill, for instance, is thought to control 45% of the world's grain trade and has operations everywhere from salt to oil to fertiliser to cotton. It's important to note their influence isn't limited to just the cash crops itself, but to the crops' many uses in various industries: the garment industry, the home furnishings (carpets, home insulation etc), the biofuel industry...

Absolutely fascinating, and seems a little scaremongering. I shall definitely be picking up the book as soon as it makes the transatlantic journey.
stinglikeabee: classic denny colt  (giornalista)
From The Guardian: Filmmaker Lisa F Jackson survived a terrifying sexual assault in New York. But she was still shocked by the tales women told her when she made a documentary about rape in the Congo.

The article goes briefly into her experience filming the documentary The Greatest Silence: Rape in the Congo (broadcast on HBO, also recently highlighted by [personal profile] parlance). She describes a sort of 'moral inversion' where the women raped are ashamed, but the men who commit these rapes are not. When Jackson sought out the rapists, one told her they were 'inducted' into rape -- it's the 'just following orders' rationale applied to intentional sexual assault. I've yet to see the programme myself, and want to hear the interviews and try to understand why the rapes are so brutal (victims as young as four years old), why so widespread, and why so ignored by the world. Given things the way it is right now, I shouldn't be surprised if there are no clear answers. Jackson, despite having her personal case highly publicized, never found her rapists prosecuted.

The title of this post comes from a quote by one of the detectives in New York's Sex Crimes Unit Jackson is trying to film. When his colleagues congratulated him on the promotion to Homicide, he replied he HAS been working homicide for the last 15 years, 'that's what rape is: murder of the mind.'
stinglikeabee: classic denny colt  (giornalista)
The Times estimates the death toll at 50,000 and millions made homeless. The Telegraph has disturbing news that the Junta executed prisoners after the cyclone hit. The Guardian reports Bush has pledged $3 million to Burma, and asks the Burmese authorities to allow foreign aid in. The LA Times reports on the desperate situation within the country and for the expats trying to reach loved ones back home. The BBC has footage of the aid finally trickling into Burma.

There are fears of starvation, disease, and lack of clean drinking water affecting the survivors. Please consider making donations at this Google page towards Unicef or Direct Relief International, or any of the large British charity and aid organisations through the Disasters Emergency Committee.
stinglikeabee: classic denny colt  (giornalista)
For a self-professed liberal, I tend to read conservative papers a lot. Except for the gag-worthy Fox News; even I have to draw the line somewhere. Here's a list of news on teh Guarniad's online website that ought to be highlighted:

- Guardian commenter says Richard Dawkins' 'secular army must be stopped' because God is behind much of Western Europe's force for arts and creativity. Yeah, that's nice but flipping through The God Delusion, I don't see any place where Dawkins says churches must be abolished. In fact, he admits to liking choir music (I do, too) and it'd be a shame to see them go. But should the places of worship continue to receive earmarked funds because of their special (and some might argue discriminatory) status?

- JK Rowling testifies in the court case against the owner of a popular Harry Potter website. Steven Vander Ark is seeking to publish the Harry Potter Lexicon, a sort of encyclopedia of the Potter series. Rowling argues the published work would amount to 'wholesale theft' of her work. I wonder how other authors who write 'unauthorised' encyclopedias of popular series get away with it. Somewhere in my box of books, I have a Discworld guide, listing much of that universe's quicks and characters -- but it was co-written by Terry Pratchett. Additionally while the website is a collaborative effort, will the publication of the print HP Lexicon mean profits will go to Vander Ark or the staff of the site? If the former is the case it seems unfair, and doubly so since the publication is poised to be in the market before Rowling has her own Potter encyclopedia book out. Unfair is not the same as illegal however, so we'll have to see how it turns out.

- The latest in the deeply disturbing Scarlett Keeling case: her body was found to be missing several organs.  Keeling, a UK citizen, was in Goa for a holiday with her mother. Her mother was persuaded to leave the 15 year old Keeling alone in Goa while she traveled elsewhere. Unfortunately, Keeling's body was found semi-naked on a beach a few months later. At first it is ruled a drowning, but a second hard fought examination turned up evidence of rape and multiple beatings. The news of the missing organs was discovered upon a third autopsy.
There's so many unsettling points in this case, including the fact that the Goan police tried to cover up the murder, the local authorities seeking to divert attention by putting pressure on Keeling's mother (including having welfare visit her children to determine whether she was at fault for leaving her child alone), and the availability of drugs.

- Working illegally as a stripper in New York

- With world food prices skyrocketing, what could be the answer? This article  even tries to put in perspective at what level of meat consumption could be sustainable, and has a surprising answer. Of course, there's no complete solution to the possibility of a food crisis but it's nice someone is thinking about what we could do now instead of panicking and hoarding.
stinglikeabee: classic denny colt  (Default)
From The Guardian: Charities are using increasingly offensive images of women to promote their causes, such as Peta highlighting pig welfare. It's revolting, says Julie Bindel.

What's your reaction when the model of a campaign strips to the nude to publicise the message? Aside from Peta, several examples off the top of my head are actresses Milla Jovovich and Eva Mendes for the charity Clothes Off Our Back and the ladies of Calendar Girls. The pictures of Milla and Eva were published in the last issue of Jane Magazine; the latter was more cheesecake, and the pregnant Milla shone in her shoot. And although I haven't seen the movie Calendar Girls, I can imagine from the poster what the months may have looked like.

Personally, I don't have a problem with nudity as long as it's tasteful. Even gratuitous cheesecake intended to raise interest is still within my comfort zone.

Bindel however, wonders why it's acceptable when it can become exploitative. She damns Peta's campaigns, particular this example:

A heavily pregnant member of Peta's staff lent her body to the cause - naked except for a pair of pink underpants - by kneeling on all fours in a metal cage.

It's a shocking image and does it's job in making people pay more attention, but is it at the expense of dehumanising women? Again, that's the point. There's a lot of talk of speciesism, about putting the needs of the human above the animal but seriously-- why isn't it men who are caged, naked in Peta's campaigns?

A weaker example in Bindel's argument is when a group of women, on behalf of Cancer Research UK, ran naked through Regent Park in London for the cause of to highlight dangers of breast cancer. Some of the women who ran had had mastectomies, and the run was to serve as an inspiration for life after cancer. I'm not sure if this is exploitative at all. Sure, men who have survived testicular cancer would never participate in a similar stunt. But the fact that the participants had good intentions and a positive message skews it towards the comfort zone. However, imagine you're in the park when a group of naked women jog by with Cancer Research signs. Without any context, I would be extremely sceptical this was more than a publicity stunt meant to shock people.

Bindel ends by saying it's time people speak out against this use of female nudity even if it's for a good cause because "
if we hold back, such sexism only seems set to burgeon". Sexism. In charity campaigns. Who would have thought?
stinglikeabee: classic denny colt  (giornalista)
In case you've missed it, there were several rather good pieces in the opinion section of the Los Angeles Times:

MODERN SLAVERY
Slavery's Staying Power - E. Benjamin Skinner

HOMELESSNESS AND MEDICINE
Street Medicine's Hard Choices - Susan Partovi

COMMUNITY NEWSPAPERS AND JOURNALISM
Read It And Weep - Dennis McDougal

TIBET AND CHINA (Olympics)
Volcano In the Himalayas - Joshua Kurlantzick
Gold Medals, Iron Fists - Dave Zirin
Chinese Police Fire on Monks (today's Times Online)
A Beijing Boycott Won't Work (Times Online)
Free Countries Must Defy Chinese Blackmail (Guardian Online)
Younger Generation Rejects Non-Violent Tradition (Guardian Online)

I added the last four links to supplement both sides of the argument on whether to boycott the Beijing Olympics. I have a friend who is extremely proud of her Chinese heritage and is willing to overlook heinous crimes in the name of money and stability (her own words) - she already has tickets for the major sporting events in Beijing. On the other hand, my ex-supervisor will be strongly boycotting the event with members of his family and the Taiwanese community, marching against the Chinese government. It's a personal choice but one I hope people will make with facts, and not emotion.

Profile

stinglikeabee

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags